American political prisoners have no chance against Reed Elsevier.
When they decide it's time for dirty trials and lawyers, look out.
The ultimate in corporate and government corruption.
What court would ignore this?
Yet, this is the same federal judge who'd dismissed the case before! |
Cross Benjamin Cross Springer Direct Quote Con THESE People?!!
Million-dollar con man testifying to stay out of prison
America's Best & Brightest
Main Page Dirty Jury? Masters and Millionaires
For 100 years, Marquis Who's Who was the premiere Who's Who organization out of as many as 1700 Who's Who organizations. Only one true competitor came along, Who's Who Worldwide Registry, which created an actual executive networking membership, for Presidents, CEO's, Chairman of the Boards, Directors, and other true corporate and institutional leaders:
thousands of extraordinarily successful people.
WWW Registry went past Marquis' mere 10,000 listees, with a robust 74,000 members,
roughly 80% of whom were, and are, in the top three institutional ranks.
Reed Elsevier, using cash, corruption, and their unrestricted influence upon the legal and judicial communities in which Reed Elsevier reigns supreme, they crushed Who's Who Worldwide,
and took a small handful of salespeople as political prisoners.
What a total, silent scandal.
Question is, who will help these hard-working, honest... ... political prisoners?
|
Dirtiest Trials of the Twentieth Century - Crushing The Largest Excecutive Club In History
Most Disgraceful Trials In Federal Court - Perversions of Justice
How rare it is to find a case that can offer not merely two or three, instead, more than a dozen major reasons for overturning that conviction.
Here is a case studied by a respected federal judge for many months, who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.
Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the single richest and most powerful publisher in more than one hundred countries around the world,
easily. empirically and truthfully described as one of the most corrupt corporations in all of human history,
perverted the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash, power, and perqs.
Imagine a trial where not ten percent of the proceedings have ANY connection with most of the defendants.
That alone should require a separation of trial. In this case, NOT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.
The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."
For days and days and weeks and weeks, all the discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, yet,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
was under one of the worst pressures any judge can be subjected to:
pressure from the federal court of appeals above him, who, in
New York's bailiwick, remains under the control of....
Reed Elsevier, the most powerful force today
in the American arena of jurisprudence.
This can be fixed by Presidential Pardon.
Call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.
Most Disgraceful Trials In Federal Court,
featuring the lawyer best described as coprophile, Thomas FX Dunn